Communicating uncertainty in research is hard, so we worked on how best to do it—here's what you can watch out for
Earlier this summer, the four of us spent three days in a room with a dozen others whose jobs sound nothing like ours, or like each other's: a cosmologist, an emergency management scholar, a genetic counselor, a hydrologist, a neuropsychologist, a health risk communication scholar, a cognitive neuroscientist, a theater director, an investigative journalist and a meteorologist.
Phys.org
Published by CurrentWire · First coverage
Compiled by CurrentWire News Desk
Summary based on reporting from Phys.org.

Automated coverage analysis
Generated automatically from the coverage listed on this page. CurrentWire adds no editorial claims.
Coverage
1 publication is covering this story.
How CurrentWire compiled this story
Phys.org (phys.org), a Tier B publisher, filed this report on . CurrentWire published this page 20 minutes later, on .
Signal breakdown
CurrentWire ranked this story 63.5 of 100 in the snapshot this page was rendered from.
- Freshness
- 34 of 35
- Source authority
- 14 of 20
- Coverage breadth
- 4 of 20
- Geographic relevance
- 3.5 of 10
- Story prominence
- 8 of 10
- Velocity
- 0 of 5
Strongest signal: freshness, 34 of 35. How each signal is calculated.
Filed under Science · International · News.
CurrentWire is a news discovery platform. This page summarizes and links to original reporting; full articles, imagery and copyright remain with the publishers listed above.