Three jurors in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial voice frustration with holdout after mistrial
Foreperson Roni Carlson blamed the impasse on one juror, a man, who refused to change his position despite acknowledging having reasonable doubt
The Globe and Mail
Published by CurrentWire · First coverage
Compiled by CurrentWire News Desk
Summary based on reporting from The Globe and Mail.
In this story
Automated coverage analysis
Generated automatically from the coverage listed on this page. CurrentWire adds no editorial claims.
From the CurrentWire archive
- Mistrial in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial
- The jury's options in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial
- What happens next after Lindsay Clancy's murder case ends in a mistrial?
- How different would Lindsay Clancy's murder trial look if it happened in Canada?
- What is postpartum psychosis, the illness at the centre of Lindsay Clancy's murder trial?
Coverage
1 publication is covering this story.
How CurrentWire compiled this story
The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com), a Tier A publisher, filed this report on . CurrentWire published this page 12 hours later, on .
Signal breakdown
CurrentWire ranked this story 47.7 of 100 in the snapshot this page was rendered from.
- Freshness
- 12.2 of 35
- Source authority
- 20 of 20
- Coverage breadth
- 4 of 20
- Geographic relevance
- 3.5 of 10
- Story prominence
- 8 of 10
- Velocity
- 0 of 5
Strongest signal: source authority, 20 of 20. How each signal is calculated.
Filed under General · International · News. Topics extracted from this report, with other live CurrentWire stories mentioning each: Lindsay Clancy's (none).
CurrentWire is a news discovery platform. This page summarizes and links to original reporting; full articles, imagery and copyright remain with the publishers listed above.