Why does the New York Times keep calling the left ‘divisive’?
The newspaper often uses the word to describe elections with progressive contenders, implying a previous whole destroyed by the left “El-Sayed and Stevens Project Party Unity After Divisive Race,” announced the New York Times on 5 August, the day the democratic socialist Abdul El-Sayed beat out his centrist Democratic rival, Haley Stevens, in the Michigan senatorial primary. “Divisive” is now the Times’s favorite attack word, deployed repeatedly to disparage and try to undermine the astonishing…
The Guardian
Published by CurrentWire · First coverage
Compiled by CurrentWire News Desk
Summary based on reporting from The Guardian.
Automated coverage analysis
Generated automatically from the coverage listed on this page. CurrentWire adds no editorial claims.
Coverage
1 publication is covering this story.
How CurrentWire compiled this story
The Guardian (www.theguardian.com), a Tier B publisher, filed this report on . CurrentWire published this page 2 hours later, on .
Signal breakdown
CurrentWire ranked this story 65.8 of 100 in the snapshot this page was rendered from.
- Freshness
- 27.8 of 35
- Source authority
- 14 of 20
- Coverage breadth
- 4 of 20
- Geographic relevance
- 10 of 10
- Story prominence
- 10 of 10
- Velocity
- 0 of 5
Strongest signal: geographic relevance, 10 of 10. How each signal is calculated.
Filed under Politics · United States · News. Topics extracted from this report, with other live CurrentWire stories mentioning each: New York (18), Elections (7), York Times (none).
CurrentWire is a news discovery platform. This page summarizes and links to original reporting; full articles, imagery and copyright remain with the publishers listed above.